| The
Asynchrony Theory |
|
The three-element asynchrony
of horse, saddle and rider interaction
After carrying out a series of innovative scientific
studies throughout 2010, The Saddle Research
Trust has discovered evidence that indicates
measurable characteristics in saddle performance.
This ground breaking new work has also highlighted
previously unrecognised areas of saddle performance.
These findings, which have the potential to
be of great importance to the future of equine
performance and welfare, urgently require further
investigation.
Out of these studies, a new theory has been
born: The three-element asynchrony of horse,
saddle and rider interaction.
|
|
Rider
Asymmetry
Initially, the object of the SRT studies was
to measure the effect of rider asymmetry. However,
it soon became apparent that there was a more
complex pattern of interaction than could be
simply explained by a rider sitting crookedly.
Most people will be aware that their bodies
are not perfectly symmetrical, and as riders,
we are usually aware of being right or left-handed.
In most instances, this “handing” tends to favour
the right; even if a person writes with their
left hand, their posture is generally right
handed. This is commonly described by riding
instructors as “collapsing the hip”. More accurately,
this is described as “hyperflexion of the spine”.
The rider will favour sitting more to the left
of the saddle and in doing so, bend the waist
to the right, and rotate the upper body to the
right (Fig. 1).
The effect of this is reduces coordination and
balance, resulting in increased loading of the
left stirrup and corresponding gripping with
the right leg.
Fig.
1 (right) - collapsing the right hip
|
 |
|
The
De-Coupling Effect
In general terms, this means that the rider has
a tendency to a vertical misalignment in the left/right
plane: imagine a puppet on a string – if the strings
on one side are loose, he will extend his joints,
while the tighter strings on the opposite side
will contract the joints – we describe this as
decoupling.
The decoupling effect describes
the exaggerated loss of symmetry of the rider
in the vertical plane.
The movement of the horse’s back and limbs moves
the saddle; the more rigid the frame of the saddle,
the more movement will be generated. Our observation
is that saddle movement is always asymmetrical.
This generates an unstable platform for the rider.
This instability consequently creates imbalance
in the rider; the resulting compensatory action
of the rider in turn accentuates asymmetrical
posture.
Fig. 1b (right) - the decoupling
effect |
 |
In figs. 2a and 2b, the three-element
asynchrony is clearly demonstrated. The same
horse and rider are viewed in two different
saddles. On the left, the rider can be seen
in her own rigid saddle and on the right,
in a flexible saddle.
Taken during the same stride phase, the left
hand image shows that when the right hind
is weight bearing, the horse’s pelvis rolls
to the left and the saddle drops to the right
- the rider hyperflexes / decouples to the
right. In the right hand image, the synchrony
shows a marked improvement with the use of
a flexible saddle
Figs. 2a & 2b (below)
The de-coupling effect: vertical misalignment
|
 |
|
| Horse
Asymmetry
A similar lack of symmetry exists in the horse
in the horizontal plane. Like humans, horses tend
to be right handed. The horse, by contracting
the right side of his body, preferring to flex
the neck and poll to the right, and therefore
pushing more weight onto the left forelimb, often
demonstrates this. The horse’s movement is no
longer smooth and along two tracks. The horse
“positions” itself to the right and moves the
quarters crookedly. In trot, this can be observed
as a tendency to swing the quarters to the left,
but in the canter, this is reversed with the quarters
usually swinging to the right.
In conventional treed saddles, horses will tend
to move the tree points alternately as the scapulae
move back and forth against them. Any asymmetry
either in scapular movement or shape will create
greater asymmetrical movement of the saddle. Similarly,
if the saddle is asymmetrical, it may create greater
lateral excursions on one side of the horse’s
back in comparison with the other.
Fig.
3 (below) - The scapula swings against the tree
point
|
 |
This effect can be observed from the rear -
the cantle swings from side to side as the horse
moves along a straight line. In the example
below, a wide shouldered native pony constantly
pushes the saddle from right to left as he moves,
creating an unstable platform for the rider.
Figs. 4a & 4b (below) - Saddle movement
creates an unstable platform for the rider
|
| |
|
This effect can be exaggerated when the horse
turns. The inner scapula will become more dominant
in pushing against the tree point. Without the
rider, the saddle may be even less stable at
the rear with the subsequent swing even greater
(Fig. 5). The weight of the rider will not stop
the swing, but will serve to increase the torque
against the horse’s back.
Fig. 5 (below left) - The dominant scapula
pushes against the tree point in the turn
|
 |
 |
| In
fig.6 (above right), the saddle has swung to the
extreme right, positioning the left side of the
base panel onto the extreme right side of the
horse’s back. |
| In
the past, riders have often been criticised for
poor technique, and at times it may be true, but
is far from the whole story, which is far more
complex. In our studies it does not appear to
be a simple “chicken and egg” that is “Which became
crooked first - the rider or the horse?” It is
better described as the “de-railing effect”. |
|
|
The De-Railing
Effect
Imagine railway carriages running
along on a track – if there is an obstruction
that stops any part of the carriage from flowing
freely along the track, it will de-rail.
Fig. 6b (right) - The de-railing
effect
|
 |
| The
de-railing effect describes the loss of symmetry
of the horse in the horizontal plane. This means
in general terms that the horse has a tendency
to horizontal or longitudinal misalignment. If
the force generated by the hindlimbs is impeded,
it will tend to push the vertebral column and
limbs off track in a similar way to a train crash
causing the carriages to de-rail and jacknife.
|
| The
horse compensates for carrying the asymmetrical
rider and the subsequent loss of balance by counterbalancing
with the neck and bracing against the load with
the left forelimb. For example, this is often
described by the rider as a tendency for the horse
to “fall in” on the left rein. The hindlimbs are
in turn prevented from swinging freely in a forward
motion, no longer being able to travel in the
same path as the blocked forehand therefore deviating
to the side (Fig. 6b). The tendency is that the
asymmetrical rider exagerrates the asymmmetry
of the horse and vice versa.
Our understanding is that the
degree to which this exaggeration occurs is greatly
affected by saddle design and fit. A saddle that
can accommodate the correct movement of the horse
without excessive movement or force will enable
the horse and rider to be more symmetrical and
balanced. The saddle can create a viscious circle
or possibly a benign one.
|
|
A horse’s shape and movement
can tilt the saddle either to the left or to the
right whether it is static or in motion. The horse’s
back shape is often asymmetrical, so even at halt,
the saddle may settle crookedly on the horse’s
back. Equally, the saddle may appear to sit symmetrically
at halt, but moves asymmetrically when the horse
moves. The pattern of this movement will also
alter between different riders using the same
saddle on the same horse.
|

Fig. 7 (above) - An asymmetrical back
|

Fig. 8 (above) - The saddle
tilts to the left at halt |
If there are any clinical reasons why the horse
may favour one side of its body more than another,
it may contract the musculature on one side
and move in an unlevel fashion, even if not
overtly lame, causing the saddle to be carried
asymmetrically. Many low-grade hind limb lamenesses
are not readily apparent, even to highly specialised
equine veterinary clinicians and in some cases,
the only clue may be that the horse does not
carry the saddle symmetrically. So-called “bridle
lameness” is often a ridden performance issue
that cannot be simply explained, but may be
a complex cocktail of symptoms involving subtle
asymmetries in the horse and its movement, the
rider, the saddle and most importantly, the
interaction between them.
In fig.8 (above right), the saddle can be seen
tilting to the left at halt, thus leaving the
rider’s left seatbone unsupported and causing
her pelvis to drop to the left.
|
| The
same combination, in sitting trot, generates a
more complex pattern: |
| 
|
When the left hindlimb is weight bearing, the
horse’s pelvis rolls to the right and the saddle
moves and tilts to the left, taking the rider’s
pelvis with it (left).
Fig.9a (left) - Left hind weight bearing
|
|
When the right hind is weight bearing, the
saddle and rider are aligned. This is an asymmetrical
pattern, demonstrating a clear lack of synchronisation
in the three-way interaction of horse, saddle
and rider (right).
Fig. 9b (right) - Right hind weight bearing
|
|
| In
most research studies, if a single question is
asked, the answer is often a myriad more questions.
We have raised such questions as: “What
effect does this three-way asynchrony in the interaction
of horse, saddle and rider have on the welfare
and performance, not just of the horse, but also
of the rider?” Furthermore “
Do different saddle designs affect the synchrony
in different ways?” This valuable work
may be in its infancy, but will have far-reaching
effects.
This valuable work may be in
its infancy but will have far-reaching effects,
having demonstrated a clear need for further investigation
into the levels of asymmetry found and the potential
to utilise this in the diagnosis of clinical lameness.
The fast pace of technological development means
that we are now able to utilise systems that can
analyse performance parameters and investigate
the effect of concepts that can make a real impact
at all levels of equestrianism, from amateur to
elite. |
|
| The
Saddle Research Trust is continuing
its work in investigating welfare and performance
in the horse and rider and will publish the results
of current studies as they become available. |
|
|